Research Paper On Electronic Health Records

1. Mancuso-Murphy J. Distance education in nursing: an integrated review of online nursing students’ experiences with technology-delivered instruction. J Nurs Educ. 2007;46(6):252–260.[PubMed]

2. Lopez T, Clinton S. Will law schools go the distance? An annotated bibliography on distance education in law. Law Library Journal. 1999;91(4):655–691.

3. Haugen S, Becker D, Erffmeyer R. Standards for determining the quality of online MBA education: a survey of accredited programmes. International Journal of Services and Standards. 2004;1(2):193–205.

4. Menachemi N, Prickett C, Brooks R. The use of physician-patient email in Florida 2005–2008: a follow-up examination of adoption and “best practice” adherence. J Med Internet Res. 2011;12(1):e23.[PMC free article][PubMed]

5. Galewitz P. Medical practices increasingly allow online appointments. U S A Today. 2011 January 3;

6. Menachemi N, Ford EW, Beitsch LM, Brooks RG. Incomplete EHR adoption: late uptake of patient safety and cost control functions. Am J Med Qual. 2007;22(5):319–326.[PubMed]

7. HIMSS. EHR definition. [Accessed January 31, 2011].

8. Winslow EH, Nestor VA, Davidoff SK, et al. Legibility and completeness of physicians’ handwritten medication orders. Heart Lung. 1997;26(2):158–164.[PubMed]

9. Rodriguez-Vera FJ, Marin Y, Sanchez A, et al. Illegible handwriting in medical records. J R Soc Med. 2002;95(11):545–546.[PMC free article][PubMed]

10. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–504.[PubMed]

11. IOM. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2001. [PubMed]

12. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1311–1316.[PubMed]

13. Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(4):313–321.[PMC free article][PubMed]

14. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology. Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on Defining Key Health Information Technology Terms. [Accessed April 18, 2011].

15. Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, et al. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;Suppl:W5-10–15-18.[PubMed]

16. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742–752.[PubMed]

17. Menachemi N, Brooks RG. Reviewing the benefits of electronic health records and associated patient safety technologies. J Med Syst. 2006;30(3):159–168.[PubMed]

18. Erstad T. Analyzing computer based patient records: a review of literature. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2003;17(4):51–57.[PubMed]

19. Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(12):1409–1416.[PubMed]

20. Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG. Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(2):w282–w293.[PubMed]

21. AHRQ. National Healthcare Quality Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0013ed.

22. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, et al. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(13):965–970.[PubMed]

23. Ledwich LJ, Harrington TM, Ayoub WT, et al. Improved influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in rheumatology patients taking immunosuppressants using an electronic health record best practice alert. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(11):1505–1510.[PubMed]

24. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Tierney WM. Effects of computer reminders for influenza vaccination on morbidity during influenza epidemics. MD Comput. 1992;9(5):304–312.[PubMed]

25. Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance. Med Care. 1986;24(8):659–666.[PubMed]

26. Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, et al. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):969–977.[PubMed]

27. Willson D, Ashton C, Wingate N, et al. Computerized support of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment protocols. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:646–650.[PMC free article][PubMed]

28. Rossi RA, Every NR. A computerized intervention to decrease the use of calcium channel blockers in hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(11):672–678.[PMC free article][PubMed]

29. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100(1):130–138.[PubMed]

30. Demakis JG, Beauchamp C, Cull WL, et al. Improving residents’ compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders. JAMA. 2000;284(11):1411–1416.[PubMed]

31. Bates DW, Goldman L, Lee TH. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA. 1991;265(3):365–369.[PubMed]

32. Nies J, Colombet I, Zapletal E, et al. Effects of automated alerts on unnecessarily repeated serology tests in a cardiovascular surgery department: a time series analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:70.[PMC free article][PubMed]

33. Tierney WM, Miller ME, McDonald CJ. The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(21):1499–1504.[PubMed]

34. Wilson GA, McDonald CJ, McCabe GP., Jr The effect of immediate access to a computerized medical record on physician test ordering: a controlled clinical trial in the emergency room. Am J Public Health. 1982;72(7):698–702.[PMC free article][PubMed]

35. Chen P, Tanasijevic MJ, Schoenenberger RA, et al. A computer-based intervention for improving the appropriateness of antiepileptic drug level monitoring. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(3):432–438.[PubMed]

36. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Rittenberg E, et al. A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests. Am J Med. 1999;106(2):144–150.[PubMed]

37. Devine EB, Hansen RN, Wilson-Norton JL, et al. The impact of computerized provider order entry on medication errors in a multispecialty group practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(1):78–84.[PMC free article][PubMed]

38. Chertow GM, Lee J, Kuperman GJ, et al. Guided medication dosing for inpatients with renal insufficiency. JAMA. 2001;286(22):2839–2844.[PubMed]

39. Mullett CJ, Evans RS, Christenson JC, Dean JM. Development and impact of a computerized pediatric antiinfective decision support program. Pediatrics. 2001;108(4):E75.[PubMed]

40. Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, et al. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(5):547–556.[PMC free article][PubMed]

41. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1197–1203.[PubMed]

42. Menachemi N, Chukmaitov A, Saunders C, Brooks R. Hospital quality of care: does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008;33(1):51–59.[PubMed]

43. Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, et al. Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):108–114.[PubMed]

44. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, et al. Electronic health records’ limited successes suggest more targeted uses. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(4):639–646.[PubMed]

45. McCullough JS, Casey M, Moscovice I, Prasad S. The effect of health information technology on quality in US hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(4):647–654.[PubMed]

46. Jones SS, Adams JL, Schneider EC, et al. Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(12 Suppl HIT):SP64–71.[PubMed]

47. Schmitt KF, Wofford DA. Financial analysis projects clear returns from electronic medical records. Healthc Financ Manage. 2002;56(1):52–57.[PubMed]

48. Williams B. How to do an ROI (return on investment) Healthc Inform. 1990;7(2):30–32.[PubMed]

49. Mildon J, Cohen T. Drivers in the electronic medical records market. Health Manag Technol. 2001;22:14–18.[PubMed]

50. Agrawal A. Return on investment analysis for a computer-based patient record in the outpatient clinic setting. J Assoc Acad Minor Phys. 2002;13(3):61–65.[PubMed]

51. Tierney WM, Miller ME, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. JAMA. 1993;269(3):379–383.[PubMed]

52. Wang SJ, Middleton B, Prosser LA, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003;114(5):397–403.[PubMed]

53. Ewing T, Cusick D. Knowing what to measure. Healthcare Financial Management. 2004;58(6):60–63.[PubMed]

54. Miskulin DC, Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, et al. Computerized decision support for EPO dosing in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54(6):1081–1088.[PMC free article][PubMed]

55. Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N, Menachemi N, et al. The differential performance effects of healthcare information technology adoption. Information Systems Management. 2007;24(1):5–14.

56. Virapongse A, Bates DW, Shi P, et al. Electronic health records and malpractice claims in office practice. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(21):2362–2367.[PubMed]

57. Aspden P. Patient Safety Achieving a New Standard for Care. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 2004.

58. Kukafka R, Ancker JS, Chan C, et al. Redesigning electronic health record systems to support public health. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40(4):398–409.[PubMed]

59. Menachemi N, Powers TL, Brooks RG. The role of information technology usage in physician practice satisfaction. Health Care Manage Rev. 2009;34(4):364–371.[PubMed]

60. Elder KT, Wiltshire JC, Rooks RN, et al. Health information technology and physician career satisfaction. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2010;7:1d.[PMC free article][PubMed]

61. Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(7):441–450.[PMC free article][PubMed]

62. Pathman DE, Williams ES, Konrad TR. Rural physician satisfaction: its sources and relationship to retention. J Rural Health. 1996;12(5):366–377.[PubMed]

63. CDW. CDW Healthcare Physician Practice EHR Price Tag. Vernon Hills, IL: 2010.

64. Miller RH, West C, Brown TM, et al. The value of electronic health records in solo or small group practices. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24(5):1127–1137.[PubMed]

65. Fleming NS, Culler SD, McCorkle R, et al. The financial and nonfinancial costs of implementing electronic health records in primary care practices. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30(3):481–489.[PubMed]

66. Menachemi N. Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are ‘imminent adopters’ and how do they differ from other physicians? Inform Prim Care. 2006;14(2):101–108.[PubMed]

67. Zurita L, Nohr C. Patient opinion: EHR assessment from the users perspective. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(2):1333–1336.[PubMed]

68. Westin AF. Public attitudes toward electronic health records. Privacy and American Business. 2005;12(2):1–6.

69. Parver C. How the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Changed HIPAA’s privacy requirements. CCH Health Care Compliance Letter. 2009 July 28;:4–7.

70. Innes S. 3 UMC workers fired for invading records. Arizona Daily Star. 2011 January 13;

71. Bruen BK, Ku L, Burke MF, Buntin MB. More than four in five office-based physicians could qualify for federal electronic health record incentives. Health Aff (Millwood) 30(3):472–480.[PubMed]

72. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(15):1477–1479.[PubMed]

Electronic Medical Records

Electronic health record (EHR) systems record health-related information on an individual so that it can be consulted by clinicians or staff for patient care. One formal definition of an EHR is “an electronic version of a patient’s medical history, that is maintained by the provider over time, and may include all the key administrative and clinical data relevant to that person’s care under a particular provider, including demographics, progress notes, problems, medications, vital signs, past medical history, immunizations, laboratory data, and radiology reports” (CMS, 2016).

The EHR has the potential to streamline the clinician’s workflow and to support evidence-based decision support, quality management, and outcomes reporting (Safran et al., 1993; Bates et al., 1998; Kaushal et al., 2003). However, implementation of EHRs can be slow, expensive, and have usability problems (Koppel, 2010; Jamoom and Hing, 2015; Jha, 2011; Kushniruk et al., 2013). In the United States the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has developed and deployed the Vista Electronic Health Record system (Evans et al., 2006). Formal evaluations of EHR in developing countries have shown successful implementation. For example, the Indian Health Service’s Vista system showed that the majority of clinicians viewed its implementation positively and hence used it more (Sequist et al., 2007). The Mosoriot Medical Record System evaluation in Kenya showed improved staff productivity and reduced patient wait times (Rotich et al., 2003). OPENMRS system is an open source freely available system that has been implemented in Africa (Seebregts et al., 2009), Haiti (Fraser et al., 2004), and Peru (Fraser et al., 2006).

Laboratory information management systems are used to report results to administrators and healthcare personnel. These systems can potentially decrease the time to communicate results, reduce errors, and improve the productivity of a laboratory. These systems have also been deployed in low-resource settings, such as a system in Peru (Blaya et al., 2007), where despite some challenges, such as a limited number of trained personnel, the system was deployed across a wide region.

Pharmacy information systems can be used to order, dispense, or track medications or medication orders, including computerized order entry systems. A systematic review (Robertson et al., 2010) of the impact of computerized pharmacy order entry systems and clinical decision support systems described how usage of these systems resulted in improvements in safety concerns such as drug interactions, contraindications, dose monitoring, and adjustment. These systems can also be used to determine if medication is being prescribed according to clinical guideline recommendations. This study noted that without good communication between pharmacists and physicians, the full benefits of this type of system may not be realized. Developing countries are also deploying these systems. A case–control study of a pharmacy information system in Mexico showed an increase of 41% of patients handled and 28% in the number of tests processed (Alvarez Flores et al., 1995). Training and communication processes are critical issues in the successful implementation of these systems.

0 thoughts on “Research Paper On Electronic Health Records

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *